👋 Hello World

Please no more Digg Traffic!!!

List of most digged domains in 2007

Interesting news last week where populair blogs lifehacker and gizmodo announce that they prefer people from not digging every article anymore. An surprising post ofcourse resulting in mass diggs, because if the digg community loves something, that would be talking about themself…

Their reasons to stop digging their website include the following:

  • Prefer people to click their banners, instead of digging.
  • Don’t want to keep adding servers every week.
  • They want to be viewed as profesional journalist, instead of link bait writers.
  • And many other reasons we common people will never understand…

But lets see how many frontpage stories these and other sites actually get. With the Digg API I grabbed the data from 01 Feb 2007 to 15 June 2007, and counted what domains got the most stories made populair (the notorious frontpage). A quick sort of the array created a list that show 3,033 unique domains getting 13,091 frontpage listings in the last five and a half months. On average there are 90 frontpage stories from 20 sources (domains) per day.

treehugger.com (74)
metacafe.com (82)
flickr.com (84)
lifehacker.com (87)
thinkprogress.org (95)
reuters.com (104)
destructoid.com (105)
msn.com (105)
google.com (107)
rawstory.com (110)
crooksandliars.com (111)
washingtonpost.com (112)
consumerist.com (116)
break.com (119)
go.com (126)
wired.com (152)
nytimes.com (179)
blogspot.com (188) - various blogs
cnn.com (188)
gizmodo.com (194)
yahoo.com (206)
engadget.com (302)
arstechnica.com (395)
co.uk (469) - various sites
youtube.com (1249)

Although Gizmodo.com got 194 frontpage stories, and Lifehacker.com 87, YouTube should have been the one complaining with over 1,249 stories (well videos in this case)! Surprisingly only 3,000 unique domains have ever been on the digg homepage: I thought the internet was bigger?!

So if this list teaches us one thing, that would be that expanding digg’s horizon beyond the current 3,000 websites might not be such a really bad idea because the ‘top’ sites don’t appreciate it anyway,!

PS: See this page for the complete list of frontpage domains.

Posted by

WordPress Theme Generator

Because I “do stuff-with-internet” I am frequently asked if I can create a blog for friends. Eventually I always end up with the same default theme (Kubrick). Just because I don’t have time to make a unique theme every time.
Somehow nobody ever created a theme generator where you click & try a few colors, a nice layout, tabs, titles, logo, and end up with something nice!

So here we are many hours later: WordPress Theme Generator.
It lets you design a complete theme (with widget support), save to a .zip file, extract and upload. Easy & Fast. No need for CSS or PHP knowledge. Let me know your comments, so I can improve (if needed).

Few Simple Examples:

imageimageimage image image

So, if you want to create a WordPress theme fast & easy: Try it out.

Posted by

Awareness Project

Today the website millionsoulsaware.org has been launched. Millionsoulsaware.org is a not for profit project that has the mission to raise awareness by featuring an article on an important topic that needs attention. Millionsoulsaware.org doesn’t ask for donations, but asks you to spread the word. The millionsoulsaware.org goal is to get one million souls aware on the current subject: Refugee camps worldwide.


The upcoming weeks I will be promoting this in the web community and hope to reach the goal of a million souls aware within several weeks. I’ve added ‘ads’ of the project to my adsense alternate ad code, and ask websites that are reading this to look at it and try it out: help raise awareness on a important topic and no more blank ads on your site. If you have a blog you might wanna try writing about something actual important.

If you have time to read this, make some time to also read the article. Awareness is the starting point for a better world. Thank you.

UPDATE 21 April 2007: Millionsoulsaware.org is going at a good pace! The counter is over 11,000 souls aware after three weeks, but we already reached a 1 million goal because the banner (above) is being downloaded almost 1 million times a day (!). With help of my lyrics site friends. Click through rate is low, but we’ll get there…

Posted by

R.I.P. - A tribute to web 1.0

A millennium ago the web was made of static websites with flashy ‘ Click Here ’ .gif files optimized for windows 95 on a 36k modem. These sites had no AJAX techniques, profiles, blogs, let alone an option to comment. The internet was a place to look around, instead of interaction.

Now – a whopping 61,352 hours later – it’s hard to believe on how we could spend our time online without updating our profiles, downloading the newest Prison Break episode, uploading Flickr photo’s, filling our iPod with iTunes songs and reading the latest Google news.

Let’s go back into history and check out what happened to the websites that were ‘hot’ back then. Are there still pieces alive of the old web, or have these sites become an useless appendix?

In ’95 Hotmail was introduced: the first place to get a free email address, disconnected from an ISP.

Hotmail was properly the first contact with the powers of the internet for many novice web users: communicating by email. Four years later after its launch 30 million people worldwide were exchanging @hotmail email addresses. At some point Hotmail was almost thought to be the only way to ‘email’ by n00bs.

Hotmail was bought by Microsoft in 1998 for just 400 million dollars, a bargain for pre-internet bubble standards.

Now in 2007 the end of Hotmail is near – although the @hotmail.com won’t go anywhere- since its transformation to “Live” mail to become an integrated part of the Microsoft’s “Live” family.


Geocities was the most popular place where you could create your own free homepage on the web.

In 1997 Geocities was the fifth most popular website, with over 500,000 homepages created. Yahoo bought Geocities two years later for $3.57 billion dollars. And started to actively commercialize the homepages with various advertising types that resulted in their death sentence. With ‘real’ web hosting becoming affordable for anybody, the need for free homepages in this form vanished. Geocities accounts are now only used for outdated information, and to upload/download illegal mp3 files from...


Search engine Altavista was the Google of the previous millennium. The first real effort to index the World Wide Web. It was popular because it was one of the few search engines that actually came up with good search results.

But Altavista had a hard time fighting spam listings in their results.

While spam grew logarithmic in Altavista, some company named Google found a way to prioritize web pages more intelligently, and thus keep spam out better.

When people tried Google and compared it was Altavista, it became an easy switch. Since then their market share in the industry dropped to almost nothing, with only visitors from old bookmarks. Altavista never (tried to) recover. Yahoo! is now the proud owner of this piece of history.


ICQ – for the younger people a abbreviation of “I seek you” – created in 1996 was an easy to use instant messenger program where you could add friends to your list, see if they were online and chat. Doesn't sound new at all, but back then it was revolutionary for the masses and it became the ‘application’ everybody had installed.

ICQ was acquired by AOL in June 1998 for a whopping $287 million plus contingent payments of up to $120 million over three years based on growth performance levels.

What went wrong? Eventually the program got too many additional features that made the application heavy and unorganized. While competition of AOL IM, Yahoo IM, and MSN Messenger increased, and friends on your ICQ-list left the application. Eventually resulting in a mass abandoning of the network.


Netscape, now only famous for the oldschool “optimized for Netscape” on outdated webpages, has dropped from a browser share of over 50% in ’98 to less than 1% now.

What went wrong? Netscape was ‘victim’ of Microsoft’s notorious ways of dealing with competitors. But in the end most blame lies with Netscape self, due to lack of innovation and inability to tie customers to their product. The netscape browser was good in the beginning but got slowwww, buggy, and had an (even more) ugly layout compared to Internet Explorer.

Struggling to survive Netscape became in 2006 a non-innovative boring web portal, waiting to completely disappear into the history books.


Bringing a online standard in streaming audio since ’95. The first audio from the web was transmitted in the Realplayer format. This was in a time of .wav files and slow 36k modems: not a good combination. Real had created the solution with their applications, and (live) internet broadcasts was born.

But what went wrong? The Realplayer audio format – and player - became obsolete due to - locally savable - small sized mp3 files, and Windows Media Player – distributed standard on all pc’s. Yes, the death story resembles Netscape Vs. Internet Explorer. Also the program became too commercial with annoying ‘buy pro version’ pop-ups every 10 minutes.

Network Solutions

The web hasn’t always been on ‘open’ place. In the previous millennium there was only one company available where you could buy a .com, .net or .org domain.

For the small price of 100 dollars and a two year minimum, you would get your own domain name. But back then there was still a big chance you would be able to buy a dictionary word as .com.

It took until the beginning of 2000 until they lost the monopoly position and domain prices dropped over 95%.

Since then innovation halted and Network Solutions became one of the thousands anonymous domain registrars.

If you believe some critical websites or information are missing. Drop me a message, so I can complete this tribute to something maybe useful.

Posted by

8 questions about the web you always wanted answers to

The most popular 10,000 websites analyzed - 8 Questions & Answers

Last week I had the urge to do some real quantitative data analysis. After several days of programming data collection scripts, I compiled a huge database of data. If you want to see the source of my results check the raw outcomes on this page. In this post I’ll answer the most interesting frequently asked questions about the web (NSFNN* alert):

Is porn dominating the web?

From the 10,000 most popular websites, 10% is marked as adult oriented. Sounds like a lot, but the total reach of these sites are a mere 5%. So the answer is no, the web isn’t all 18+

Interesting is the fact that The Netherlands (population 16M) is 3rd in owning adult websites. As they say: where a small country, can be big. The USA is of course number one and China doesn’t even appear in the list although they own 10% of the websites.

Is China taking over the web?

Luckily the answer is short: No. The USA owns 44% of all websites, but China is coming second with 9%. That is less than the number of European websites with 16%. But in reach Europe loses from China with respectively 7% against 9%. Conclusion is that Chinese language courses aren’t necessary yet.

Hola, 你好, Konnichi-wa – excuse me, what language?

Although one might argue that my data is off (more people understand Chinese and Spanish than English ). A majority (55%) of the websites are English. Chinese takes second place, and third is Spanish. Arabic is also well represented with 3,3%. All the other languages don’t take a significant part of the web. Sorry French people.

Are all websites made in Silicon Valley?

This is actually more or less true. From all US states California (37% reach) has a significant advantage over any other state, it actually owns 7% off all the identified websites in the top 10,000. Second comes New York in number of websites but Washington has a higher reach (22%).

I was already link building my Geocities.com account!

Maybe link popularity wasn’t a hype in the early days of the web. But the data does show that geocities.com deserves that pagerank of 10/10 because it has over eight times more incoming links than google.com (2nd). So link building might not be very hip and trendy as you would expect.

The most linked list continues with the usual suspects like Adobe, Amazon, Microsoft, Wikipedia and Apple. I don’t know why, but third - with 260,000 incoming links - is some Chinese website (http://miibeian.gov.cn). Does anybody know what it is? Update: explained

Is it true that Yahoo and MSN are more used than Google?

The statistics are ambiguous on this. But going from my data Google actually has the biggest reach (9%) if you add all 72 local domains together. In number of views Google loses from Yahoo! that has 12% (!) of the total views. (Damn you, Yahoo! Games)

About MSN: I personally only happen to land there if I mistype a domain, or check my spam (hotmail) but they still seem to take 4% of the total reach-pie.

Has the web evolved to web 2.0?

Web 2.0 is hard to measure (Maybe because it doesn’t exist). But I’ve tried by location RSS feeds and stylesheets. And the results are actually quite surprising. 10% of all the homepages provide an RSS feed (If people actually use these RSS feed is of course a different analysis).

And 58% use stylesheets on their homepage for layout.

So maybe we can conclude there is actually some evolving going on, and ’s aren’t dominating design style anymore.

Why do I always see ‘ads by Goooooogle’?

I’ll tell you why: 6% of the homepages contain Google ads! That is a 55% reach of all advertising networks identified. And it gets even better. If you add the Google ads on the Google search engine they have a total 12% reach. The Doubleclick network has a reach of 7% with 403 websites. This is - more or less – also nice.

*NSFNN: not safe for NOT nerds

*** For comments drop an email to the address on the right.

Posted by

Why Can't I Change?

some thoughts on change

It’s in our human psychology to keep the status quo: we prefer going the route we were going all along. The opposite of the status quo is change. Humans are very bad in initiating change. Change means that you have to put effort, it’s unpredictable, creates risk, and worst of all: means that we were wrong before.

Changes are often wanted to improve a current situation. At a certain point you have to decide to change while the option to continue is still open. Visualize this as a crossroad where you can continue, but also change, and turn. Wanting to change rarely succeeds.

Most changes made in our lives are forced changes:

  • Forced into change: at some point you are at a “T” intersection, forced to make a decision because continuing is no option. The change is often postponed as long as possible.
  • Gradually change: at some point you are at a “Y” intersection, where continuing straight on is no option, but a decisions (thus change) has to be made.
Our day-to-day decisions are made unconsciously through use of heuristics. It’s too complicated for our brains to think everything over. Change has to be initiated by our conscious mind because our unconsciousness will prefer status quo and heuristics. These separated parts of our brain don’t work well together. And the old heuristics conflict with the change wanted by our consciousness.

E.g. smoking
Although all signs and information are indicating that people should stop smoking because it makes them sick, of all the millions of people that smoke, around 70% of them want to stop. To quit smoking is one of those changes you have to decide upon, put effort into, and you would have to do on your own. But only few (6% actually succeeds) are able to succeed to change (stop) without having to have a doctor telling them that it is quit or die (“T” intersection).

Think about it:What have you ever consciously changed in your life?

Posted by

Create your own Tag Cloud - Easy!

For a website - that wanted to be very web 2.0 - I had to create a tag cloud like this on del.liou.us or at flickr. People think they are cool and useful, so who am I to disagree?! Why re-invent the wheel every time, when we have the internet as an unlimited source for code stealing examples.

So as part III of my coding-give-aways* (I,II) I give you:

The Tag Cloud Creator

1) make a $variable with all the words you want in your tag cloud.

2) grab this php example file that is only 30 lines in size (you can use it any way you want)

3) include it somewhere on your site, upload it to your server and - if you are not the dumbest nerd - you should get something like this:

Digg.com - as search cloud or try it on other sites.

5) now you have created your own tag cloud to use for a searchengine, photoarchive, or whatever you want.
So have fun, and tell your social community friends.

Posted by

Easy Fuzzy Logic with MySql – The end of “no results found”

As a web programmer I ran into the problem when running a complicated (user) search on Mysql that the results are too strict, and thus giving the well known error “no results found”. While good (although not perfect) results exist!

The problem

When a traditional search query is initiated, sql queries are being generated in the terms of:

User search: where tv_manufacturer=”sony” and tv_description =”%widescreen%” and tv_price < 1000;

A user is asking for a Sony television AND that is widescreen AND less then 1000 dollar. This will show very accurate results. But limits the opportunities when (a best matching) TV is $1050. The users would be okay with paying $50 more in real life. But our query won’t allow it. We want to have that (almost perfect match) results shown!

This query can be rewritten by replacing the AND with OR in the query, but by using OR we get inaccurate results because results will show any TV below 1000 dollar OR any Sony OR any widescreen - useless.

The good news is that we can solve this without having to ask a user the factual and nerdy: WIDESCREEN AND (SONY OR 1000 DOLLAR) – way to difficult.

The answer is in what is named ‘fuzzy logic’. Fuzzy logic is more natural and (semi-) intelligent by mathematical logarithms:

User search: a preferably Sony TV with widescreen support for more or less a 1000 dollars, I prefer less. Please.

A few specialists software company’s offer fuzzy logic software, but this is highly tailored to the specific needs of the system.
But Mysql has a solution, with a few hacks will result in accurate results.

The solution:

The solution is to be found in the “MATCH AGAINST” function of Mysql. It is a text matching system where you can add your preferences, and the query gives points to indicate the score in matching.
Very few people use this, maybe because they are disappointed that it is only matching text. But in this post I will show you how to also integrate a (in the real world less strict) demand like: less then $1000.

We do this by encoding the numbers to a word. In this case the TV price of our tv in the database will be encoded to unique words like “pricemaxthousand”, etc.

All the features of the TV are being stored in a new (text only) column named encodedsqlrow.
So we get this: encodedsqlrow = “sony widescreen pricethousandtotwothousand diagonalthirtyinch”.

With the match against function we can also search “IN BOOLEAN MODE”. This will add ‘preferences’ to every search demand (word) in our query.

The preferences you can give to a demand (word) are in the order of:
+ = Obligated
> = Important
~ = More or less important
- = Without

And last but not least, we can retrieve a score with every results. So the most accurate results can be listed at the top.

With all this together we (a user) can create a search query that will results in more natural human-like picked results.

Creating our query:


< 1000)
$encodedsearch = “>

sony +widescreen ~pricemaxthousand”;

Getting the score:

Select tv_manufacturer, MATCH (encodedsqlrow) AGAINST (’$encodedsearch’ IN BOOLEAN MODE) as score

Setting the match search:

WHERE MATCH (encodedsqlrow) AGAINST (’$encodedsearch’ IN BOOLEAN MODE) ORDER BY score DESC

Example Page – integrated:
For a dutch website I made this function so it matches all studies (1800) against the many demands of a to-be-student. Like he could say: I am searching for a study obligated in Amsterdam with more or less important in the economic field with important average workload important mostly female on a more or less important university.
Many demands, and this will result in accurate results that include studies in Amsterdam although it has mostly male students.

Have any questions or want to bash this text: email address is on the right hand side of your screen.

Note: the database column (encodedsqlrow) must have an FULLTEXT index (via phpMyAdmin the blue “T” the at ‘actions’. This will make it searchable for the MATCH AGAINST function. Else it won’t work.



Posted by

Easy AJAX inline text edit 2.0

As everybody knows, refreshing pages is so 1999. AJAX, DOM, whatever you call it makes it possible to let people edit a piece of text inline without having to use a submit button.
You say: but that ain’t new at all! I say: But all of this has been made easy to use and implement: 2.0!

Example page: inline edit (no JS knowledge needed) [source ] | Inline example: Please edit me!

How you can make it work (5 easy steps for integration)

  • Download this javascript file: InstantEdit 2.0 JS
  • Create a update file that handles the input. For example this PHP: update file
  • In your page add the javascript:
  • Optional: Set fixed vars (like hidden elements in a field post). These will be posted with the editable field so you can identify a user/session.
  • Last step: in your HTML for any editable field add a SPAN around it.

You’re done!

How it works

A small piece of javascript reads all SPAN tags, checks if it has class=“editText” and a id=. If that is true, it adds a onclick function. That onclick function will create a textfield or input (depending on the size of the editable text). Someone has the ability to edit the field. When the text field is blurred, it will read the contents, and starts a XMLHttpRequest and ‘sends’ the content + fieldname + any set vars to an update file. That file will update your database, and reply with the newly set text and the textfield will disappear again.


This script works in Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari.

Update hack

If you want to force a textarea over a textfield (for example to edit a piece of HTML) use class=“editText” offsetHeight=“10”.

If you want to PUSH an ID to your script I use: id=“edit_userID_$userID”. In your update script, strip the text, and keep the $userID. Et voila.

Posted by

What is going wrong with msn search

Microsoft bashing is easy… but when they say stuff like “Microsoft (search) will be better then Google within 6 months”, I say… bullsh*t.

Everybody knows this screen when entering a non-existent url:

Think one second and wonder if you ever had any relevant results? Well I’ve never had any in the past three years. How easy is it to make this function work? They just don’t care: the only way I get in a MSN network site is by this hijack, and it’s never been helpful. First impression really count… and by the way, the MSN new search results still suck: they already had their update a few months ago, so why didn’t they do it right the first time if it was so easy to beat Google?

Posted by

1 2 3 4 5